decision sent to author nature communications

by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort After reviewing the reports, you can proceed to making decisions on papers. New submissions that remain Incomplete more than 90 days will be removed. The results were significant for all pairs: group 1 vs. group 2 (2=15.961, df=1, p value <0.001); group 2 vs. group 3 (2=7.1264, df=1, p value=0.0227); and group 1 vs. group 3 (2=37.304, df=1, p value <0.001). PubMedGoogle Scholar. We also performed logistic regression modelling with author update, out-to-review, and acceptance as response, and journal tier, author gender, author country, and institution as predictors. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". In the ten countries with the highest number of submissions, we found a large significant association between country and review type (p value <0.001, df=10, Cramers V=0.189). The original authors are given 10 days to respond. JAMA. In the past if your work wasn't accepted in Nature or Science researchers would often try the respected general journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, or PNAS - which wags dubbed "Probably Not . Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114. . We found that manuscripts submitted under DBPR are less likely to be sent to review and accepted than those submitted under SBPR. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. These results suggest that the choice of DBPR may be linked with a higher perceived risk of discrimination, with the exception of gender discrimination. When analysing uptake data by journal tier, we have included both direct submissions and transfers incoming to each journal group, for a total of 128,457 manuscripts that were submitted to one of the 25 Nature-branded journals. A Pearsons chi-square test found a significant, but small association between institution group and review type (2=656.95, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.106). This choice of categories is arbitrary, e.g. We did not observe gender-related differences in uptake. How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. All communication from submission to publication will be with the corresponding author. Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. The results of a Pearsons chi-square test of independence show a small effect size (2=138.77, df=1, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.082). v)ic#L7p[ q^$;lmP)! The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the paper - another week. 0000012294 00000 n Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts In these scenarios, crowd wisdom peaks early then becomes less accurate as more individuals become involved, explained senior author Iain Couzin, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. 0000004498 00000 n Research Integrity and Peer Review We aimed at modelling acceptance based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. This can be due to quality or referee bias. I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. 0000047805 00000 n An analysis of the journal Behavioral Ecology, which switched to DBPR in 2001, found a significant interaction between gender and time, reflecting the higher number of female authors after 2001, but no significant interaction between gender and review type [11]. In this scheme, authors are given the option to publish the peer review history of the paper alongside their published research. making DBPR compulsory to accelerate data collection and remove potential bias against the review model. Any pending input will be lost. Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. Author uptake for double-blind submissions was 12% (12,631 out of 106,373). This decision is taken solely by the editors, who are aware of the chosen peer review model as well as all author information. 2.3 Procedures Communications Arising submissions that meet Nature's initial selection criteria are sent to the authors of the original paper for a response, and the exchange to independent referees. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. Papers from more prestigious institutions are more likely to be sent to review than papers from less prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". Nature CommunicationsTips: NCOnline: 140 250 tips (Naturetransfer) NCzip"Zip of files for Reviewer" 2-4 2. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The median number of citations received in 2019 for articles published in2017 and 2018. Either behaviour may apply to different demographics of authors. This might be due to referee bias against review model, or to a lower quality of DBPR papers, or both. The motivation behind Nature Communications is to provide authors with more choice; both in terms of where they publish, and what access model they want for their papers.At present NPG does not provide a rapid publishing opportunity for authors with high-quality specialist work within the Nature branded titles. Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks. A 3D accelerometer device and host-board (i.e., sensor node) were embedded in a case . Part of That is, authors that feel more vulnerable to implicit bias against the prestige of their institutional affiliation or their country tend to choose DBPR to prevent such bias playing a role in the editorial decision. In the context of scientific literature, an analysis of 2680 manuscripts from seven journals found no overall difference in the acceptance rates of papers according to gender, while at the same time reporting a strong effect of number of authors and country of affiliation on manuscripts acceptance rates [9]. 85,307,200 Downloads (in 2021) If an author believes the decision regarding their manuscript was affected by a publication ethics breach, . Because the median is not subject to the . The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). BMC Med. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. 2006;6:12747. palabras en latn con significados bonitos. Nature Communications: n/a: n/a: 6.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . Press J to jump to the feed. Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies. We then analysed the uptake by gender for the entire portfolio, as we were interested in finding any gender-related patterns. Did you find it helpful? 0000005880 00000 n Another report found that the authors of submissions to the American Journal of Public Health were in fact recognizable in around half of the cases [3]. In the case of transfers, the author cannot change the review type compared to the original submission, and therefore, we excluded the 22,081 (17%) transferred manuscripts from the analysis of author uptake. Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. We fitted logistic regression models and report details on their goodness of fit. This is a statistically significant result, with a small effect size; the results of Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=1533.9, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.147. Add a footnote to the article displaying the electronic link to the correction notice. McGillivray, B., De Ranieri, E. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. 0000009876 00000 n 0000003764 00000 n 2009;4(1):624. We found a significant result (2=37.76, df=2, p value <0.001). Real Cuban Link Chain For Sale Near Mumbai, Maharashtra, For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. Is double-blinded peer review necessary? Authors will get real time updates on their manuscripts progress through peer review in the private author dashboard. We note here that, in recent years, trends in scholarly publishing have emerged that strongly propose transparent, or open, peer review as a model that could potentially improve the quality and robustness of the peer review process [18]. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. . Moreover, DBPR manuscripts are less likely to be successful than SBPR manuscripts at both the decision stages considered (Tables5 and 10), but because of the above limitations, our analysis could not disentangle the effects of these factors: bias (from editors and reviewers) towards various author characteristics, bias (from editors and reviewers) towards the review model, and quality of the manuscripts. Tregenza T. Gender bias in the refereeing process? 2017-07-13 11:21. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Editorial process | Nature Communications 0000001589 00000 n A study analysing 940 papers submitted to an international conference on economics held in Sweden in 2008 found no significant difference between the grades of female- and male-authored papers by review type [12]. Transfer of papers between Cell Press journals and Molecular Plant. Similar results are achieved if simpler logistic regression models are considered, such as review type modelled on journal tier and institution and review type modelled on journal tier only. trailer << /Size 54 /Info 7 0 R /Root 10 0 R /Prev 92957 /ID[<98e42fa76505e1b5b1796b170b58dfee><8c8134bb7fa785eceed4533362dfb985>] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 10 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 6 0 R /Metadata 8 0 R /PageLabels 5 0 R >> endobj 52 0 obj << /S 48 /L 155 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 53 0 R >> stream Which proportions of papers are sent out to review under SBPR and DBPR? Webb TJ, OHara B, Freckleton RP. So, in October 2018, we added a new . Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. The submission process has completed with either an Accept or Reject decision. It is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the five previous years. We calculated that, at this rate, it would take us several decades to collect sufficient data that would result in statistically significant results, so another strategy is required, e.g. 2021: Nature Communications: 14.3 weeks: 42.6 weeks: n/a: 3: 4 (very good . We have informational videos that pertain to our Journal Suggester and Transfer Desk that take about five minutes each to listen to if you are interested in learning more about them. From inspection of Table8, it would seem that SBPR manuscripts by female corresponding authors are more likely to be rejected at the first editorial decision stage than those by male corresponding authors and that DBPR manuscripts by male corresponding authors are less likely to be sent to review than those by female corresponding authors. Nature Communications is incorporating transparent peer review into the journal on a permanent basis, following a successful ten-month trial. The following is an example of a poor cover letter: Dear Editor-in-Chief, I am sending you our manuscript entitled "Large Scale Analysis of Cell Cycle Regulators in bladder cancer" by Researcher et al. Blank RM. Type of Peer Review BBRC is a rapid communications journal. We found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission, https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Timely attention to proofs will ensure the article is slated for the next possible issue. Proc Natl Acad Sci. Nature Communications Q&A - Cameronneylon.net 9. The Nature Portfolio Bioengineering Community is a community blog for readers and authors of Nature Research journals, including Nature Biomedical Engineering, Nature Biotechnology, Nature . Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. LZ. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska Abstract: The abstract not exceeding 150 words and preferably in . Springer is committed to your publishing success: If your research is of good quality, then it may be suitable for another journal. Answer: From the description of the status change of the submission, it seems the manuscript did not pass the formatting check by the editorial staff and required corrections from the author. It's simple! HUM6WEX:hQR{pe"3>g7`,. Table7 shows the results; for the sake of completeness, Table7 includes the number and percentages of rejected vs. out-to-review manuscripts for which the gender of the corresponding author was NA. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - reddit Accessed 15 Jan 2017. Table3 shows the distribution of DBPR and SBPR in the three gender categories. Times Higher Education - World University Rankings. After peer review, a decision of accept, reject, or revision is made on the basis of the reviewers comments and the judgment of the editor. Nature . MOYcs@9Y/b6olCfEa22>*OnAhFfu J 1m,&A mc2ya5a'3jyoJx6Fr?pW6'%c?,J;Gu"BB`Uc!``!,>. wuI-\Z&fy R-7. In the out-to-review analysis, we observed a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male and female corresponding authors of DBPR papers. https://www.grid.ac. 0000055535 00000 n We found that a smaller proportion of DBPR papers are sent to review compared with SBPR papers and that there is a very small but significant association between review type and outcome of the first editorial decision (results of a chi-square test: 2=1623.3, df=1, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.112). Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit Our aim was to understand the demographics of author uptake and infer the presence of any potential implicit bias towards gender, country, or institutional prestige in relation to the corresponding author. Journal Metrics | Nature Communications Next, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and institution group (Table10) to detect any bias. 0000005727 00000 n You will receive more information via email from the production team regarding the publication process.

Buod Ng Four Sisters And A Wedding, Alight Solutions Lawsuit, Isabella Rusbridger First Husband, Articles D